Overview

CONDENSED MATTER THEORY

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

14.6

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

93.2 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

94.7 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 93.2%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

CONDENSED MATTER THEORY

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 5.5 5.6 1.4 5.3 5.7 10.6 14.3 48.3 93.1% 0.9
Article, other NA 0.3 NA NA NA NA NA 0.3 100.0% 0.0
Conference paper, peer review NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.3 0.3 100.0% 1.0
Book NA 0.3 NA NA NA NA NA 0.3 0.0% 1.0
Chapter in book NA NA NA 0.2 NA NA NA 0.2 0.0% 1.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 13 14 5 19 18 29 31 129 94.6% 1
Article, other NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA 1 100.0% 0
Conference paper, peer review NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 2 100.0% 1
Book NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 1
Chapter in book NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA 1 0.0% 1

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

CONDENSED MATTER THEORY

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 5.5 19.9 3.6 0.8 15.3%
2015 5.6 14.0 2.5 1.3 24.0%
2016 1.4 5.6 4.0 0.0 0.0%
2017 5.3 37.7 7.1 0.4 8.5%
2018 5.7 20.6 3.6 1.0 17.4%
Total 23.4 97.8 4.2 3.6 15.4%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 12.4 0.49 0.4 3.2%
2015-2017 12.2 0.66 0.7 5.7%
2016-2018 12.4 0.78 1.0 7.8%
2017-2019 21.4 1.09 2.6 12.3%
Total 33.8 0.87 3.0 8.9%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 5 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 100%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 98.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

CONDENSED MATTER THEORY

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 12.4 1.33 6.0 48.4%
2015-2017 12.0 1.31 5.7 47.3%
2016-2018 12.2 1.26 4.6 37.3%
2017-2019 21.2 1.35 8.5 40.2%
2018-2020 27.3 1.18 8.4 30.7%
Total 44.8 1.24 16.6 37.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 89.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

CONDENSED MATTER THEORY

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 32 2 6.2% 18 56.2%
2015-2017 38 2 5.3% 25 65.8%
2016-2018 42 1 2.4% 34 81.0%
2017-2019 65 3 4.6% 52 80.0%
2018-2020 71 5 7.0% 49 69.0%
Total 122 7 5.7% 84 68.9%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 91%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
United States 27 25 2 0 0 7.4
United Kingdom 23 19 4 0 0 5.5
Germany 19 18 1 0 0 4.6
France 18 13 5 0 0 4.0
Finland 13 11 2 0 0 3.7
Russian Federation 10 10 0 0 0 3.1
Norway 7 5 2 0 0 1.6
Spain 5 5 0 0 0 1.6
Japan 6 4 2 0 0 1.6
India 5 4 1 0 0 1.2
China 5 4 1 0 0 0.9
Israel 4 3 1 0 0 0.8
Australia 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Korea, Republic of 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Iceland 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Canada 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Switzerland 5 2 3 0 0 0.5
Ukraine 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Estonia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Slovak Republic 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
New Zealand 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Romania 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Chile 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Denmark 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Republic of Serbia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Slovenia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG) Institute Germany 16 15 1 0 0 4.0
University of Massachusetts University United States 11 11 0 0 0 3.9
Stockholm University University Sweden 8 8 0 0 0 2.6
University of Jyvaskyla University Finland 8 8 0 0 0 2.5
University of Leeds University United Kingdom 5 5 0 0 0 1.8
Nordita Institute Sweden 5 5 0 0 0 1.4
French National Centre for Scientific Research Other Public France 5 5 0 0 0 1.4
Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute Russian Federation 3 3 0 0 0 1.3
Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Norway 4 4 0 0 0 1.2
Indian Institutes of Technology University India 4 4 0 0 0 1.1
University of Connecticut University United States 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
Russian Academy of Sciences Other Public Russian Federation 5 5 0 0 0 1.0
Kobe University University Japan 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Loughborough University University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich University Germany 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Novosibirsk State University University Russian Federation 4 4 0 0 0 0.7
Linköping University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Ningbo University (NBU) University China 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) Institute Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
University of California, Berkeley University United States 4 4 0 0 0 0.7
University of Oxford University United Kingdom 4 2 2 0 0 0.7
Aalto University University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
Paris Diderot University University France 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
University of Strasbourg University France 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Princeton University University United States 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Grenoble Alpes University University France 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
University College London University United Kingdom 4 3 1 0 0 0.6
Institute for Basic Science (IBS) Institute Korea, Republic of 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Seoul National University University Korea, Republic of 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Tel Aviv University University Israel 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
University of Tours University France 3 2 1 0 0 0.6
Complutense University University Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Reykjavík University University Iceland 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
École normale supérieure de Lyon University Other France 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
IMDEA institute Institute Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Kurchatov Institute Institute Russian Federation 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
The University of West Florida University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
University of Southampton University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
University of Warwick University United Kingdom 4 2 2 0 0 0.5
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Institute Canada 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics Institute Canada 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
University of Waterloo University Canada 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Albanova University Centre University Other Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Dalian University of Technology University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Lancaster University University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Institute Ukraine 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Paul Scherrer Institute Institute Switzerland 4 2 2 0 0 0.4
Abo Akademi University University Finland 3 1 2 0 0 0.3
University of South Florida at Tampa University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Australian National University University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
California Institute of Technology University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Donostia International Physics Center University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT) University Russian Federation 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
the Basque foundation for science (Ikerbasque) Other Public Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Bordeaux University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Cambridge University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Lyon University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Minnesota University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Orléans University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Queensland University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Tartu University Estonia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Tokyo University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Tübingen University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (UWM) University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Uppsala University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
National University of Science and Technology MISiS University Russian Federation 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Comenius University in Bratislava University Slovak Republic 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
RIKEN Institute Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Rutgers University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Milan University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Paris-Saclay University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Institut Laue–Langevin Institute France 3 0 3 0 0 0.2
Grenoble Institute of Technology University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Harvard University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Institute Romania 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research (IFV Dresden) Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Research University Higher School of Economics University Russian Federation 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Sobolev Inst Geol & Mineral NA Russian Federation 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technische Universität Dresden University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
The University of Texas at Dallas University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Agder University Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Auckland University New Zealand 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Bucharest University Romania 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of California, Santa Barbara University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Tampere University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of the Balearic Islands University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission Other Public Chile 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Stellenbosch University University South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Munich University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Innsbruck University Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of KwaZulu-Natal University South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Weizmann Institute of Science University Israel 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
European Spallation Source ERIC Institute Sweden 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Los Alamos National Laboratory Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Lund University University Sweden 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
RWTH Aachen University University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Copenhagen University Denmark 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
University of Edinburgh University United Kingdom 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
University of Oslo University Norway 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL) Institute United Kingdom 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Jozef Stefan Institute Institute Slovenia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Bath University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Belgrade University Republic of Serbia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of St Andrews University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Coventry University University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Southern Connecticut State University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Diamond Light Source Institute United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISERs) Institute India 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Institute for Energy Technology (IFE) Institute Norway 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
KYUSHU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY University Japan 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Eindhoven University of Technology University Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Microsoft Corporation Company Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Microsoft Corporation Company United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National Institute of Materials Science (NIMS) Institute Japan 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Tsinghua University University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev University Israel 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Cardiff University University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Joseph Fourier University University France 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Other Public United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0

Open Access

CONDENSED MATTER THEORY

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 13 13 0 0 13 0 0 100.0%
2015 14 13 4 4 4 1 1 92.9%
2016 5 4 0 1 3 0 1 80.0%
2017 19 19 2 2 14 1 0 100.0%
2018 18 18 4 2 12 0 0 100.0%
2019 29 27 3 7 17 0 2 93.1%
2020 33 30 8 14 6 2 3 90.9%
Total 131 124 21 30 69 4 7 94.7%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

CONDENSED MATTER THEORY

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 5.5 51.8 9.5 0.3 6.1%
2015 5.6 30.7 5.5 0.0 0.0%
2016 1.4 10.3 7.4 0.0 0.0%
2017 5.3 60.8 11.5 0.0 0.0%
2018 5.7 29.0 5.0 0.7 11.6%
2019 10.6 77.4 7.3 1.7 15.7%
2020 12.1 13.6 1.1 4.9 40.8%
Total 46.1 273.6 5.9 7.6 16.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 5 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 82.4%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 12.1 0.50 0.0 0.0%
2015-2017 12.2 0.70 0.5 4.1%
2016-2018 12.3 0.86 0.8 6.8%
2017-2019 20.1 1.19 2.2 11.1%
Total 32.2 0.93 2.2 6.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 100%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 7.0 1.54 5.5 79.2%
2015-2017 8.9 1.38 4.2 47.8%
2016-2018 12.1 1.27 3.0 24.7%
2017-2019 20.4 1.30 3.9 19.4%
2018-2020 27.3 1.16 3.1 11.2%
Total 39.4 1.26 9.6 24.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 91.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 32 0 0.0% 18 56.2%
2015-2017 38 0 0.0% 25 65.8%
2016-2018 41 0 0.0% 33 80.5%
2017-2019 65 1 1.5% 52 80.0%
2018-2020 74 1 1.4% 51 68.9%
Total 125 1 0.8% 86 68.8%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 93.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row